The Indian automobile industry is facing a ₹25,000 crore hit to its bottom line for fiscal year 2025-26 due to the Environment Protection (End-of-Life Vehicles) Rules 2025, which trigger an accounting standard clause requiring automakers to make budgetary provisions for environmental compensation for vehicles sold in the past.
The Core Problem: Rule 4(6)
According to industry executives, an "innocuous looking" clause in the Environment Protection (End-of-Life Vehicle) Rules, 2025 notified by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change in January 2025, has spooked automakers after their auditors flagged the magnitude of its ramifications.
Rule 4(6) of the January 2025 notification states: "In case the producer stops its operations, the producer must comply with its Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) in respect of vehicles already made available in the market till closure of operations."
This rule triggers accounting standard IND AS 37 ('Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets'), which means automakers will have to make substantial financial provisions for the cost of EPR certificates for all vehicles sold over the past 20 years for private vehicles and 15 years for commercial vehicles.
Industry officials stated that due to this rule, automobile companies will have to make provisions for EPR for vehicles sold in the past even if they have no intention of exiting the market, thereby blocking funds and affecting profits.
Financial Impact Breakdown
In a letter to the ministry seen by PTI, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) wrote: "Once the environmental compensation (EC) cost is notified by CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), automobile manufacturers may be required to make substantial cumulative financial provisions under the accounting standards (IND AS 37). Preliminary estimates indicate a potential one-time industry impact of approximately ₹25,000 crore on a gross basis (around ₹9,000 crore on discounted basis) in FY2025-26."
Segment-Wise Impact
As per industry estimates, the overall industry impact on four-wheeler makers due to the rule is about ₹14,623 crore and for two and three-wheeler makers the total impact is estimated to be
₹9,650 crore for FY26.
Industry's Appeal Rejected
SIAM had sought the possibility of resolving the issue through amending Rule 4(6) before EC cost notification to clarify that cumulative budgetary provisioning may not be required.
However, the ministry in its amendment notification to the Environment Protection (End-of-Life Vehicle) Rules, 2025 on March 27, 2026, did not alter the specific clause.
Long-Term Consequences
Industry executives warned that once the provision is realized in the accounting books, it would significantly reduce the profits of that year for the entire auto industry.
This policy makes a huge dent on the auto industry's bottom line, wiping off₹25,000 crore from profits, and it may affect the ability of many manufacturers to further make investments in new technologies and fuel their growth plans.
From an institutional investor's viewpoint, the Ministry's firm stance, despite industry appeals, raises questions about how regulatory policy aligns with industrial growth long-term.
Although recent analyst reports predicted strong profitability for the Indian auto sector in FY26, this ₹25,000 crore provisioning is a major unexpected event that could significantly reduce net profits for the reporting period.
The Accounting Challenge
Unlike proactive moves towards sustainability and circular economic principles, this rule imposes a past financial burden instead of encouraging future eco-friendly practices through incentives.
The Environment Protection (End-of-Life Vehicles) Amendment Rules, 2026, reinforced the framework for EPR and producer responsibility, requiring reporting on sales data from FY 2005-06 onwards.
Setting aside funds for past sales under IND AS 37 challenges the Indian auto sector's growth and innovation plans.
Global Competitiveness Concerns
This situation could put Indian manufacturers at a disadvantage compared to global competitors with different regulatory cost structures.
The Indian auto industry is currently caught between the "Green Transition" and "Legacy Liabilities." While the intent of the Environment Protection Rules is noble—to ensure no vehicle becomes an abandoned environmental hazard—the retrospective financial burden is a "black swan" event for balance sheets.
The industry should lobby for a "glide path" where the ₹25,000 crore provision is spread over 3–5 years rather than a single-year hit to FY26 profits. OEMs must move beyond just selling cars to actively investing in Authorized Vehicle Scrapping Facilities (AVSF). By owning the scrappage centers, they can generate their own EPR certificates at cost, rather than buying them at market premiums
1. PTI/NewsDrum - "Auto industry faces Rs 25k cr hit on profits for FY26 due to end-of-life vehicle rule" (May 3, 2026)
2. Whalesbook - "India Auto Sector Faces ₹25,000 Crore Accounting Charge from ELV Rules" (May 3, 2026)
3. NewsBytes - "Why India's auto sector is staring at a ₹25,000cr hit" (May 3, 2026)
4. Asia Insurance Post - "New vehicle scrap norms may dent auto profits by Rs25K cr" (May 3, 2026)
Share